Connect with us

Feature

Renting the Future or Owning the Code? Nigeria’s Push Against Technological Feudalism at BRICS

Published

on

 

By Abubakar M. Kareto

When Vice President Kashim Shettima mounted the podium at the Bharat Mandapam for the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi, and subsequently sat across the table from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, he bypassed the usual diplomatic formalities. Delivering President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s address to world leaders and holding firm during bilateral sideline talks, the administration presented an uncompromising reality: Nigeria will no longer serve as a passive vendor of raw primary commodities or an off-taker of foreign finished goods.

The address produced a definitive policy anchor that should guide African statecraft for the next generation: “A nation that owns no technology risks renting its future.”

The Anatomy of Trade Asymmetry: Beyond the Petro-State Loop

The high-stakes bilateral session between Prime Minister Modi and Vice President Shettima brought Nigeria’s structural economic dilemmas into sharp focus. Prime Minister Modi specifically commended Nigeria for hosting roughly 80,000 Indian citizens, who represent India’s largest diaspora footprint in Africa and drive key commercial operations. Modi also made an overt appeal for Nigeria to renew and scale up crude oil deliveries to India, pointing out that bilateral trade had dropped from a historical peak of roughly $14 billion annually to approximately $9 billion.

While bilateral commerce between both partners recently rebounded past the $9 billion threshold, an honest audit reveals an uncomfortable pattern. The historical $14 billion peak rested on an asymmetric cycle where Nigeria shipped unrefined crude to Indian coastal refineries, only to re-import refined products, consumer goods, and finished pharmaceuticals.

Indian pharmaceutical supplies to Nigeria hit $315 million in recent trade cycles, supplying between 40% and 90% of certain critical categories across public and private healthcare channels. While cumulative Indian private investments in Nigeria exceed $4 billion, creating nearly 100,000 direct and indirect jobs as Nigeria’s second-largest corporate employer after the Federal Government, the commercial dynamic has centered heavily on marketing imported finished inventory rather than domestic synthesis.

Vice President Shettima’s response in New Delhi established a clear shift. Rather than treating crude oil sales as a standalone transaction, he deployed it as sovereign economic leverage. He agreed to examine the crude supply request only on the condition that India commits direct capital and technology into Nigeria’s real productive base, focusing specifically on localized active pharmaceutical ingredient synthesis, defense manufacturing, digital ecosystems, and power infrastructure.

Challenging the 1944 Global Financial Architecture

This bilateral discipline mirrored the broader systemic critique President Tinubu delivered through Shettima at the main BRICS summit hall. The administration took direct aim at the institutional obsolescence of the post-World War II global governance architecture.

The United Nations Security Council and Bretton Woods institutions were established in 1944 when Africa was largely disenfranchised under colonial rule. With Nigeria anchoring Africa’s demographic expansion and the continent commanding the world’s youngest, fastest-growing workforce, international frameworks that deny Africa permanent seats on the UN Security Council or penalize emerging economies with high-interest, dollar-denominated debt have outlived their legitimacy.

BRICS currently accounts for nearly 50% of the world’s population, 40% of global GDP, and over 26% of global trade. For Nigeria, the bloc is not an ideological protest movement, but an essential institutional counterweight. As the President’s address underscored, Nigeria expects a partnership that transitions from dialogue to delivery, from commitments to implementation, and from diplomatic cooperation to measurable development outcomes.

The AfCFTA Gateway vs. The Extraction Trap

In urging BRICS investors to view Nigeria as the natural entry point to the 1.4-billion-consumer market under the African Continental Free Trade Area, the administration attached an explicit condition that market access requires domestic value addition.

The historical practice of exporting raw critical minerals such as lithium, columbite, and rare earths only to import finished batteries and electrical equipment is obsolete. The address welcomed foreign capital in energy, critical minerals, infrastructure, and healthcare, but strictly on terms that transfer technical capacity and create direct domestic employment.

Foreign conglomerates seeking to supply the West African market can no longer rely solely on cross-border shipping. They must set up joint ventures, assemble equipment within Nigeria’s Special Economic Zones, and build resilient local supply chains.

The Code of Sovereignty: Resisting Technological Feudalism

The most consequential intellectual contribution from New Delhi was the administration’s warning against digital dependency. By calling for BRICS cooperation across Artificial Intelligence, Digital Public Infrastructure, fintech, cybersecurity, and biotechnology, the administration confronted technological feudalism head-on.

If developing nations merely consume foreign digital platforms, they will reproduce the colonial primary-commodity cycle in the digital realm by supplying raw domestic data for foreign systems to harvest, while paying unending licensing fees to foreign intellectual property holders.

National initiatives such as the 3 Million Technical Talents programme, Project BRIDGE for broadband and fiber-optic expansion, and sovereign AI frameworks form the core of Nigeria’s digital defense perimeter. As the Nigerian delegation asserted, developing nations must produce knowledge, register patents, and build independent digital architecture rather than remain passive end-users.

Translating Delhi to the Farm Gate

As Chairman of Nigeria’s National Economic Council, Vice President Shettima carries the constitutional responsibility of translating foreign diplomatic agreements into sub-national economic performance across the 36 states. The true benchmark of what was achieved at the Bharat Mandapam will be determined by tangible changes across our state economies.

Securing the national food supply requires halting post-harvest decay, which currently claims 40% to 50% of fresh produce in northern and middle-belt farming belts. Integrating India’s decentralized solar cold-chain systems into Nigeria’s Special Agro-Industrial Processing Zones will protect rural margins and compress food inflation far more effectively than monetary policy tightening.

Simultaneously, defense cooperation with India must move beyond purchasing off-the-shelf armaments toward joint maintenance, repair, and assembly partnerships directly linked to the Defence Industries Corporation of Nigeria. In the healthcare space, transitioning the existing Indian pharmaceutical footprint into domestic chemical synthesis plants for Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients will insulate the country from foreign-exchange shocks and guarantee strategic drug reserves.

The message from the 18th BRICS Summit was unambiguous: Nigeria is prepared to engage the multipolar century on its own terms. It will do so not by trading its raw future for foreign manufactured goods, but by demanding direct investment, mastering modern technology, and securing true economic sovereignty.

Abubakar M. Kareto is a Public Affairs Analyst, Commentator and Commutations Strategist, his focus includes governance, policy, politics, economy and media dynamics in Nigeria and Africa. He can be reached via email at amkareto@gmail.com and on X (formerly Twitter) @amkareto.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *